A Nuclear-Free Future is Our Common Dream: Letter from the Japanese Activists Deported from India
LATEST
To our friends who struggle for nuclear free future,
A historic movement is underway in Tamil Nadu State against Koodankulam nuclear power station. People across the world are moved by the resistance and want to express solidarity
We tried to visit India to show our solidarity on September 25 but were denied access at Chennai airport. After an hour-long interrogation, we had our paper written as “Inadmissible person” ,which denied our entrance to India. It is unforgivable for the government, which invites countless nuclear merchants from Western countries, to deny such small citizens like us. We are writing this letter because we would like you to know what we experienced.
(Keep reading fb://faceweb/f?href=%2Fsharer.php%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Ffbshare.me%252Fl69h%26t%3DA%2BNuclear-Free%2BFuture%2Bis%2BOur%2BCommon%2BDream%253A%2BLetter%2Bfrom%2Bthe%2BJapanese%2BActivists%2BDeported%2Bfrom%2BIndia%2B%25E2%2580%2594%2BDiaNuke.org%26_rdr)
Fukushima Shadow: Question about any medical issues in Koriyama-city:
Excerpts from the Fukushima Collective Evacuation Trial gathering held in Tokyo on September 14, 2012
Question about any medical issues in Koriyama-city:
A man’s comment
“I am here from Yokohama. I was diagnosed with arrhythmia one year ago at a check-up. This spring I was told my EKG was abnormal. Also my red blood cell and white blood cell count was abnormal, but the doctor told me it was no big deal and I was working too much. I actually don’t work. Also my right little fingernail split in half recently. Something like this has never happened to me before, and I don’t feel good about it at all. One more thing is that my tooth cracked when eating something hard. I realize I can’t blame everything on radiation, but I don’t feel comfortable with any of these (symptoms). How is it in Koriyama? Are there abnormalities such as arrhythmia?”
Koriyama-city woman’s response
“Thank you for being here, everyone. I would like to talk about what has been happening around me. Last May, an aunt of my daughter’s friend, a woman in her early 40’s, was found dead of heart failure while waiting in a car for about 15 minutes when her husband went into a store to pick up something for their restaurant business located in front of the station: They had gone to the neighboring Ibaraki Prefecture for an errand.
Last May or June, a woman in her early 40’s, an evacuee from Tomioka-machi living in a temporary housing in Koriyama-city, dropped dead when she touched a door. She was taken to Southern General Tohoku Hospital in Koriyama-city, but she died.
Also you might have heard that two to three Fukushima high school students have died. The one that died in July is a friend of a son of my acquaintance. They went to the same elementary school, but they are in different high schools. When the mother went to wake up the child, the child was already dead.
There is a place called Shinobuyama (in Fukushima-city) where an ambient radiation level is very high. (Note: 1.484 μSv/h on September 18, 2012) Fukushima high school students go there to do sports without wearing masks and also commute to schools on bicycles without wearing masks.
Also it might be from aging process, but my acquaintance’s huband died last May, which I didn’t know until the end of the year. I went to the altar shop
near my house to buy incense sticks and candles. The old man at the shop came out and said, “I just went to a funeral and I am totally astonished. A 48-year-old son of the greengrocers across the street suddenly died of heart failure.” Also it might be the aging process or the stress, but since the earthquake up to the end of last year, seven people died on this particular shopping street. This May my acquaintance’s husband died at age 74. That’s all that happened around me.” (keep reading http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/excerpts-from-fukushima-collective.html0
Three Mile Island Accident & NRC Lies
Laura Tattoo
"KEEP IN MIND, THE TMI (THREE MILE ISLAND) NUCLEAR POWER PLA
NT
AUTOMATICALLY SHUT DOWN TWICE IN JUST THE LAST MONTH!!! THE FIRST TIME A
HEATING ELEMENT WAS REPLACED AND THIS TIME A PUMP HAD TO BE REPLACED
"Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident (lecture in 2009)
Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen gives a talk on his calculations of the amount of radiation released during the accident at Three Mile Island. Mr. Gundersen's calculations differ from those of the NRC's and official industry estimates. Arnie Gundersen was a senior executive in the nuclear industry with over twenty years experience. Mr. Gundersen holds Bachelors and Masters degrees in Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. In 1990 he came forward as a whistleblower and was fired that same year. Over the next several years, his case got a great deal of attention, and he testified before Congress during hearings on ways to protect whistleblowers. Mr. Gundersen is now a prominent nuclear safety expert witness."
http://www.fairewinds.com/content/three-myths-three-mile-island-accident
Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident | Fairewinds Energy Educatio
www.fairewinds.com
Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen gives a talk on his calculations of the amount
of radiation released during the accident at Three Mile Island. Mr. Gundersen's calculations differ from those of the NRC's and official industry estimates. Arnie Gundersen was a senior executive in the nuclear industry...
-----------------------------------------
Avertable Earth Changes, Nuclear Power and Mutual Survival
Public event · By Laura Tattoo
https://www.facebook.com/events/488870871125605/495004483845577/?notif_t=plan_mall_activity
"Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident (lecture in 2009)
Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen gives a talk on his calculations of the amount of radiation released during the accident at Three Mile Island. Mr. Gundersen's calculations differ from those of the NRC's and official industry estimates. Arnie Gundersen was a senior executive in the nuclear industry with over twenty years experience. Mr. Gundersen holds Bachelors and Masters degrees in Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. In 1990 he came forward as a whistleblower and was fired that same year. Over the next several years, his case got a great deal of attention, and he testified before Congress during hearings on ways to protect whistleblowers. Mr. Gundersen is now a prominent nuclear safety expert witness."
http://www.fairewinds.com/content/three-myths-three-mile-island-accident
Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident | Fairewinds Energy Educatio
www.fairewinds.com
Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen gives a talk on his calculations of the amount
of radiation released during the accident at Three Mile Island. Mr. Gundersen's calculations differ from those of the NRC's and official industry estimates. Arnie Gundersen was a senior executive in the nuclear industry...
-----------------------------------------
Avertable Earth Changes, Nuclear Power and Mutual Survival
Public event · By Laura Tattoo
https://www.facebook.com/events/488870871125605/495004483845577/?notif_t=plan_mall_activity
Three Mile Island Accident
Uranium Mining India, The Story of Jadugoda
The Story of Jadugoda, the chief
source of India's Uranium
Overview
Jadugoda, located in the mineral-rich Singhbum district of Jharkhand,
is
the chief source of Uranium in India, providing fuel for the
nuclear reactors. However, the uranium
comes at a colossal
human cost. In this case, those paying the price are adivasis
(indigenous population), the Santhal, Munda and Ho tribes. Due to the
proximity of the mine, a large number of villagers suffer from cancer,
skin diseases, physical deformities, blindness, brain damage,
disruption of menstrual cycle or loss of fertility. Villagers, evicted
from their lands, work as
miners and are exposed to a heavy dose of radiation. Uranium
Corporation of India Limited (UCIL), responsible for operating the mine
refutes the allegations and refuses to acknowledge the problems.
However, independent researchers believe that it is difficult to
conceive of any reason, other than radiation, for the human and
environmental catastrophe. This site has been created to provide a
window to outside world to Jadugoda and its problems, a creation of our
own. In the hope that those responsible for creating problems can also
work towards addressing them. http://www.jadugoda.net/Video: Buddha weeps in Jadugoda
http://jadugoda.blogspot.com.au/----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kolsefan/Justice Kolse Patil
Jutice Kolse Patil who left the exalted chair of a judge from the Bombay high court in 1990 to work among the people is committed to free this country from the cannibal capitalists and thereby achieve complete independent from the evil forces. He is a man of great strength and vision. He completed his schooling in Ahmednagar and then transferred to the Poona Law College where he completed his LLB. Justice Kolse Patil specialized in criminal law. He was District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor in Poona from 1980 to 1985. From 1985 to 90 he served as a Judge of the High Court. In 1990 he resigned from the High Court to serve social causes on a full time basis. He does not believe in being out of touch with people. Instead he travels around the country to uplift the downtrodden masses of the nation. He is a man of the people. Indians have great admiration for him. He truly believed that he could not rest until the last unfortunate human being has been helped. His personal desire for freedom from Capitalism and Brahmanism has restored a sense of pride among farmers, Dalits and minorities. He believes the exploitation and domination of one community over another can have no place in a multicultural and multilingual country.He exhorts Muslims to come out of an illusionary world. The former judge attacks the well-entrenched Brahminism in India. He is not against any religion or its practices, he says: "When I say Brahmins I mean the mentality which has ruled this country for years. You have Brahmins among Muslims too. They don't want the underprivileged to get their fair share in the economy, he says.
He unearthed the Hindu terrorists plans in Nanded and Malegaon. He was accompanied with the rights activists Teesta Setalvad, Arvind Deshmukh and others.
About Muslim Terrorism, he says Its complete injustice to one community, because whenever you catch any Muslim youth without any proof you start calling him terrorist but in the case of Hindutva militants BJP and other saffron fundamentalists openly support them despite the proof of their involvement in the bomb blasts in Nanded, Malegaon and other places. Also, he says covering up the incidents points to the deeper conspiracy.
He says, Hindutva militants justify their terrorist activities with the help of the saffron press. They always accuse the government is anti-Hindu. Muslims killed in Gujarat, Sikhs killed in Delhi, Christian killed in Orrisa, is this anti-Hindu government? If it would be anti-Hindu government, then these acts would not have been perpetrated. In fact it is an anti-Minority government. Instead of implementing Sri Krishna Commission the government is diverting the attention of minorities by Sachar Commision. If the secular government is really serious to bring the goons of 1993 riots to the book, why the
implementation of the Sri Krishna commission is being delayed. He says, we can never believe BJP as it is controlled by RSS who have the honor of killing Gandhi.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kolsefan/Justice_Kolse_Patil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Justice B G Kolse Patil (C), along with Teesta Seetalvad (L) and Vaishali Patil (R) addresses an anti Jaitapur Nuclear power plant press conference at Press Club in Mumbai on Monday, May 16, 2011.- Salman Ansari.DNA
http://dnasyndication.com/dna_photogallery_editorial_images/pid=DNMUM208867
==============
Letters to the Commissioners of Police http://www.ambedkar.org/News/rss/rss55.htm
****************
卡爾思帕蒂爾法官
卡爾思帕蒂爾法官于 1990 年在人群工作從孟買高等法院離開法官的崇高的椅子, 致力於從食人資本家手中自由這個國家，從而實現完全獨立于邪惡的勢力。他是一個有偉大力量和遠見的人。他在亞美德納加完成他的教育，然後轉移到浦那法學院完成他的法律學士學位。卡爾思帕蒂爾法官專門在刑事法中。從 1980 年到 1985 年他是區政府請願人和浦那檢察官。從 1985到 90 他擔任高等法院法官。1990 年他辭去了高等法院擔任全職的社會原因。他不同意與人民脫節, 相反他環遊全國隆起的被壓迫民族的群眾。他是人民的人。印度人很佩服他。他真正相信他可以不休息直到最後一個不幸的人得到説明。他個人渴望自由資本主義與婆羅門教從恢復了農民、 達利特人和少數群體之間的榮譽感。他認為剝削和統治的另一個社會可以沒有任何位置在一個多元文化和多語言的國家。
他奉勸一個虛幻的世界中走出來的回教徒。前任法官的攻擊在印度根深蒂固的 Brahminism。他不是針對任何宗教或其做法，他說："當我說婆羅門我意思的心態年統治了這個國家。你也有穆斯林的婆羅門。他們不想要的弱勢社在經濟中得到公平的份額，他說。
他出土的印度教恐怖分子計畫在楠代德和岡。他陪同與權利活動分子 Teesta 塞塔爾瓦德，阿爾溫德德希穆克和其他人。
關於穆斯林恐怖主義，他說其完整的不公正到一個社區，因為每當你趕上而無須證明任何穆斯林青年您開始叫他恐怖但 Hindutva 好戰分子在印度人民黨和其他藏紅花的原教旨主義公開支援他們儘管有其參與楠代德、 岡和其他地方發生炸彈爆炸事件的證據。此外，他說掩蓋事故點到更深的陰謀。
他說，Hindutva 好戰分子辯護的藏紅花新聞界説明其恐怖活動。他們總是指責政府是印度教。古吉拉突邦錫克教徒在德里，殺殺的穆斯林基督教在 Orrisa 中喪生，這是印度教政府嗎？如果這是印度教政府，然後這些行為會不犯。實際上它是一個反政府。而不執行斯里蘭卡 Krishna 委員會政府轉移的少數的薩查爾使命的注意力。如果世俗政府是認真的為什麼到這本書，使 1993年暴亂的流氓
斯里蘭卡 Krishna 委員會的執行受到拖延。他說，我們從來沒有可以認為印度人民黨，因為它由榮幸地殺害甘地的 RSS 控制。
來自維琪百科，自由的百科全書
HTTP://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kolsefan/Justice_Kolse_Patil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
司法 B G Kolse 帕蒂爾 (C)，以及 Teesta Seetalvad (L) 和後帕蒂爾 (R) 位址反 Jaitapur 核電站運行新聞發佈會上記者俱樂部在上星期一 2011 年 5 月 16 日孟買。-薩勒曼 Ansari.DNA
HTTP://dnasyndication.com/dna_photogallery_editorial_images/pid=DNMUM208867
==============
寫封信給員警專員
HTTP://www.ambedkar.org/News/rss/rss55.htm
Strong supply chain supports new build
13 September 2012
With nuclear new-build investment set to top some $1.5 trillion by 2030, the World Nuclear Association (WNA) has launched an in-depth report assessing the role and development of a robust and reliable supply chain to support the growing nuclear power sector over the next two decades.
 |
| Juan Molina presents the report at the WNA Symposium |
The World Nuclear Supply Chain: Outlook 2030 looks at the challenges and opportunities presented by plans for a total of 160 new units to enter service by 2030. It builds on work from the WNA's biennial Global Fuel Market Report, taking three scenarios for nuclear generating capacity to illustrate the range in size of the potential market for nuclear power plants.
The 154-page report was unveiled at the WNA's 37th annual symposium in London by Juan Molina, who chairs the WNA's Supply Chain Working Group as well as being chief procurement officer for Westinghouse.
Over $500 billion will be spent globally on international procurement to support nuclear new build over the next two decades, WNA estimates. Nine consolidated vendors today offer much of the technology and services that support the entire nuclear fuel sector, alongside a handful of other significant players, mostly engineering companies. Emerging industrial economies, such as China and India, are open to international procurement (albeit with governments keen to maximize locally manufactured content), and the supply chain that is evolving to support nuclear plant construction is an internationally diverse one.
A new reactor requires around 200 complex or heavy forgings, and only a few presses in the world have the capacity to accept ingots of the necessary size. But a nuclear plant also requires millions of other components: a modern light water reactor requires over 2000 km of cabling, 210 km of piping, 5000 valves and 200 pumps. Further, in addition to those components that must be of 'nuclear' grade, a nuclear plant requires a host of so-called commercial grade components and structures, ranging from the turbogenerator systems to the staff canteen. There is plenty of scope for competition, although new suppliers of nuclear-grade components must gain the necessary accreditation before they can enter the market, especially if they are manufacturing safety-critical components.
There is currently ample capacity in the supply chain, documented comprehensively in the WNA report. As Molina explained, a reliable, robust and international supply chain can work to reduce cost pressures, in part by reducing supplier bottlenecks, while a large global market will boost investment, and a diverse range of players in the market will encourage innovation.
The report makes a considered analysis of the multifaceted nuclear industry supply chain, including areas in which developments can work to strengthen not only the supply chain but the whole nuclear industry: standardization of reactor designs and consistent safety requirements, harmonization to a more coordinated system of supplier certification and monitoring of nuclear grade component manufacturers, harmonization of trade and export/import regulations, and developing the supplier base are some of the supply chain strengthening measures highlighted in the report.
The nuclear industry is already taking action, Molina noted. Two WNA working groups - the Supply Chain working group and the working group on Cooperation in Reactor Design Evaluation and Licensing (CORDEL) - are actively working on areas including defining a common vendor approach to supplier certification, convergence in mechanical design codes and standards, and contributing to the development of guidance and best practice on licensing and permitting.
The report makes a considered analysis of the multifaceted nuclear industry supply chain, including areas in which developments can work to strengthen not only the supply chain but the whole nuclear industry: standardization of reactor designs and consistent safety requirements, harmonization to a more coordinated system of supplier certification and monitoring of nuclear grade component manufacturers, harmonization of trade and export/import regulations, and developing the supplier base are some of the supply chain strengthening measures highlighted in the report.
The nuclear industry is already taking action, Molina noted. Two WNA working groups - the Supply Chain working group and the working group on Cooperation in Reactor Design Evaluation and Licensing (CORDEL) - are actively working on areas including defining a common vendor approach to supplier certification, convergence in mechanical design codes and standards, and contributing to the development of guidance and best practice on licensing and permitting.
"We need to find a way to make it easier for our suppliers, and ourselves, to do what needs to be done," Molina said. "We can make things easier for the industry and the world."
Researched and written
by World Nuclear News
by World Nuclear News
US bank finances UAE project
10 September 2012
The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) is
to lend the Barakah One Company $2 billion to underwrite the export of
US components and services for the construction of the the United Arab
Emirates' (UAE's) first nuclear power plant.
The Barakah nuclear power plant will comprise four Korean-designed APR-1400 pressurised water reactors, but the bank says the $2 billion credit line will support some 5000 jobs in the USA. US company Westinghouse is a member of the Korea Electric Power Company (Kepco)-led consortium which was selected to build the plant, and will provide a range of components and services including reactor coolant pumps, controls, engineering services and training.
The Ex-Im Bank is a federal agency which helps to support US manufacturing jobs by filling gaps in private export financing. Before approving the loan, the bank conducted a "detailed and extensive" risk assessment of the Barakah project.
The loan is the bank's largest ever transaction in the UAE as well as its first financing of a 'greenfield' nuclear plant in over a decade. It has the support of the US National Security Council and the US departments of state and energy. Noting the importance of the transaction to the US economy, Ex-Im Bank chairman and president Fred Hochberg said the bank would also "make history" by backing the construction of the first nuclear power plant in the region.
Construction officially began at Barakah in July, and the first unit is scheduled to enter service in 2017.
Researched and written
by World Nuclear News
Original: US bank finances UAE project
The Barakah nuclear power plant will comprise four Korean-designed APR-1400 pressurised water reactors, but the bank says the $2 billion credit line will support some 5000 jobs in the USA. US company Westinghouse is a member of the Korea Electric Power Company (Kepco)-led consortium which was selected to build the plant, and will provide a range of components and services including reactor coolant pumps, controls, engineering services and training.
The Ex-Im Bank is a federal agency which helps to support US manufacturing jobs by filling gaps in private export financing. Before approving the loan, the bank conducted a "detailed and extensive" risk assessment of the Barakah project.
The loan is the bank's largest ever transaction in the UAE as well as its first financing of a 'greenfield' nuclear plant in over a decade. It has the support of the US National Security Council and the US departments of state and energy. Noting the importance of the transaction to the US economy, Ex-Im Bank chairman and president Fred Hochberg said the bank would also "make history" by backing the construction of the first nuclear power plant in the region.
Construction officially began at Barakah in July, and the first unit is scheduled to enter service in 2017.
Researched and written
by World Nuclear News
Beyond Nuclear Fact Sheet Catastrophic Risks of GE BWR Mark I
High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Pools
High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Pool Fire at Fukushima Daiichi
The Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe has clearly shown just how risky General Electric Boiling Water Reactors of the Mark I design are, including their high-level radioactive waste (HLRW) storage pools. Although the U.S. nuclear power establishment is still trying to deny it, evidence has mounted that Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4’s pool boiled dry to the point that highly radioactive irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies were exposed to air overheated, caught fire, and discharged catastrophic amounts of radioactive cesium-137 directly into the environment. This is because GE BWR Mark I pools – as with most pools at nuclear plants – are not locate within a primary radiological containment structure. Also, at Fukushima the reactor meltdowns and explosions damaged or destroyed the secondary containment structures (referred to as reactor buildings), at Units 1, 3 and 4, leaving those pools open to the sky. Unit 1 has since been covered with a tent. Unit 2 did suffer relatively small hole in its reactor building, as well.
As Stohl et al. have reported: “Our results indicate that 137Cs emissions peaked on 14–15 March but were
generally high from 12 until 19 March, when they suddenly dropped by orders of magnitude exactly when
spraying of water on the spent-fuel pool of unit 4 started. This indicates that emissions were not only coming
from the damaged reactor cores, but also from the spent-fuel pool of unit 4 and confirms that the spraying wa an effective countermeasure.”1 Thus, the HLRW fire in the Unit 4 storage pool caused some of the worst
radioactive Cs-137 releases during the catastrophic first week at Fukushima. It was his concern that the Unit 4 pool had boiled dry that prompted U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman Gregory Jaczko, in the very first days of the catastrophe, to order an emergency warning to Americans in Japan to evacuate to at least 50 miles away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
The Reactor No. 4 pool contained 135 tons of irradiated nuclear fuel; Reactor No. 1’s pool had 50 tons, No. 2’ 81 tons, and No. 3’s 88 tons. It took months for Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) and emergency responders to restore regular cooling water flow to certain of the pools. Some may still lack it. To restore water to the pools, as the thermally hot irradiated nuclear fuel boiled it away, ad hoc cooling efforts have include attempts to drop water by helicopter, as well as water spraying by fire truck, concrete pump truck, and even rio control water cannons. The Unit 4 reactor building is severely listing; its pool floor is supported by steel jacks for fear that it could fall out. A large aftershock could collapse the pool, instantly drain its cooling water, an reignite a radioactive waste fire. Unit 3’s pool appears filled with debris, so the condition of its irradiated fuel i unclear. Given the dangers on-site, including high radiation dose rates, when and how TEPCO and/or th Japanese federal government will be able to remove the HLRW to a safer location is yet to be determined Also, it is unclear when, or even if, a close examination of the four pools will occur, to determine what exactly happened where, why, and how bad the radioactivity releases have been.
What are the risks?
While all nuclear power plant HLRW storage pools are risky, GE BWR Mark I pools are especially vulnerable to accidents or attacks. A boil down or drain down of the cooling water could spark a fire in the irradiated fuel, as seen at Fukushima. GE BWR Mark I pools are elevated four to six stories high, above the reactor as well as outside the primary containment structure. The reactor building is not robust, as shown by the explosions at Fukushima. The design made it easier for the plants to remove irradiated fuel from the reactor core directly into the pool, but puts the pools at increased risk of heavy load drops, attacks by airplanes, etc. Emergency response is complicated by the pools’ high elevation above ground. NRC has not required pools to have emergency backup power connected to cooling systems, nor emergency make up water. Thus, they...(Keep reading http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/catastrophic%20risks%20of%20GE%20BWR%20Mark%20I%20HLRW%20storage%20pools.pdf )
超越核實況報導 奇異馬克一型沸水堆的災難性風險
超越核實況報導
奇異馬克一型沸水堆的災難性風險
高水準放射性廢物存儲池
高水準放射性廢物存儲池火福島第一核電站
福島核災難已清楚顯示多麼冒險一般電動沸騰水反應堆
馬克一型包括其高級別的放射性廢物 （廢料） 存儲池。雖然美國核電建設仍試圖否認它、 證據已裝入該 〃 4 號的池煮幹到高放射性輻照的核燃料元件被暴露在空氣中，點過熱、 著火了，和出院災難性數量的放射性銫-137 直接進入環境, 這是因為 奇異馬克一型沸水堆池 — — 因為在核工廠 — — 大多數池不是位於在主放射安全殼結構。此外，福島反應器的崩潰和爆炸損壞或毀壞的二級結構 （稱為反應堆廠房)、 單位 1，3，並向天空打開 4，離開這些池。
單元 1 一直以來被一頂帳篷。確實受到單位 2其反應堆廠房，以及孔相對較小。
作為施托爾 et 報告說："我們的研究結果表明 137 排放 3 月在 14–15 上達到頂峰，但被
從 3 月 19 日，當他們突然下跌數量級到底何時才 12 一般較高4 號機組開始乏燃料池上水的噴塗。這表明排放不了才來從破損反應堆芯，而且還從 4 號機組的乏燃料池，並確認噴塗是有效對策。
"1 這樣，單位 4 存儲池的廢料大火造成一些最差放射性銫-137 釋放期間災難性的第一個星期在福島。這是他的關切，單位 4池已經煮幹，在促使美國核監管委員會 （NRC） 主席葛列格里姚茨科這場災難，命令在日本的美國人在疏散到緊急警告的最初幾天從福島第一核電站的至少 50 英里。
反應堆號 4 池所載 135 噸的輻照核燃料 ；1 的反應堆號儲存了 50 噸， 2 號的 81 噸和 3 號 88 噸。東京電力電源公司 (東京電力公司)花了幾個月的 和緊急急救員要恢復定期冷卻水流向某些池。一些仍可能缺少它。若要還原水到池，如熱熱的輻照的核燃料煮沸它，特設冷卻努力包括試圖用直升機，放水，以及水噴霧消防卡車、 混凝土泵車、 甚至暴動控制水炮。單元 4 反應堆廠房嚴重上市 ；由鋼的插孔，支援其池底因擔心它可能會掉出來。強烈餘震可以折疊池，立即耗盡其冷卻水，及重燃放射性廢物火。
單元 3 池出現充滿了碎片，所以其輻照燃料的條件還不清楚。鑒於危險現場，包括高輻射劑量率、 東京電力公司和/或日本的聯邦政府何時和如何將能夠刪除到一個安全的位置廢料尚待確定。
此外，目前尚不清楚時，或即使，四個池的接近考試將會出現，以準確確定什麼
凡發生了，為何，以及如何壞放射性釋放了。
有哪些風險？
雖然所有核電站廢料存儲池都都有風險，奇異馬克一型沸水堆都是特別易受傷害意外或攻擊。A 歸結或下來的冷卻水流失可能引發輻照燃料火災，福島發生了。奇異馬克一型沸水堆池是四至六層樓高高架的高架，上面的反應堆以及作為主安全殼結構之外。反應堆廠房不是強健，如圖所示的福島爆炸。設計使廠房從反應堆堆芯直接進入刪除輻照的燃料更容易儲存，但放在重負荷下降，燃料池風險增加飛機等的攻擊。緊急情況回應由池的高海拔地面變得複雜。NRC 已不需要的池來了緊急備用電源連接到冷卻系統，也沒有緊急補水量。因此，他們仍然易受斷電，像福島由於地震和海嘯發生的情況。
在美國，主電網已失敗龍捲風、 颶風、 水災、 火災、 冰風暴、 人為錯誤，wildlife2，
等，並已與美國緊急備用的柴油發電機故障的令人不安的圖案核 plants.3
多次的警告置若罔聞下降
幾十年來NRC 早知道池的風險，在 2001 年年初報告廢料火災可能導致約 25,000 潛在的癌症死亡人數在 2003 年 9/11 之後在 500 英里下風處.4 攻擊，阿爾瓦雷斯 et 發表一份報告，說明如何在美國輻照的核燃料池火能呈現區域無法居住，將比創建的車諾比爾意外事故高達 60 倍.5
美國國家科學院在 2005.6 給予確認 et · 阿爾瓦雷斯的調查結果奇異馬克一型沸水堆是，核安全聯盟，組成的數十個環境加劇的風險組，敦促的決策者優先進入硬化現場存儲清空從這些池廢料(胡)，它防止意外，並鞏固它的攻擊 ；近 200 個組織現在贊同另一份重要報，阿爾瓦雷斯 HOSS.7 重複他對風險的沸水堆池存儲中的警告美國在福島核.8 超越之後提交 NRC 與應急執法呈請書月後，福島災難開始，要求在奇異馬克一型沸水堆上安裝緊急備用電源。
雖然加國研會在 2011 年 12 月已審查這一問題，其福島專責小組同意一年後福島、 國研尚未需要提昇安全.9
在美國的 24 個 奇異馬克一型沸水堆廢料存儲池在哪裡？
在美國"雙胞胎"設計對福島第一核電站單位 1 到 4 之間的有 23 運行的反應堆。他們
是：
布朗一渡輪 1、 2 和 3 (AL) ；
布勞恩斯魏克 1 & 2 （NC） ；
庫珀 1 (NE) ；
德累斯頓 2 和 3 (IL) ；
杜安 · 阿諾德 1
(IA) ；費米 2 （MI） ；
菲茨派翠克 1 (紐約) ；
孵化 1 & 2 （GA） ；
希望克裡克 1 (NJ) ；
蒙蒂塞洛 1 (錳) ；
九英里點1 (紐約) ；
克裡克蠔油 1 (NJ) ；
桃底部 2 和 3 （PA） ；
朝聖者 1 (MA) ；
四城市 1 & 2 (IL) ；
佛蒙特州揚基隊 1 (VT)。
此外，自 1995 年以來在 CT、 磨石單位 1 雖然反應堆已被永久關閉，它的主人，統領核的里士滿弗吉尼亞州"的結論他們將會保持磨石單位1 直到 2048年燃料中花了燃料池，在一個 SAFSTOR 的地位，而不是將燃料移至 ISFSI[獨立花燃料存儲安裝]。
阿爾瓦雷斯的 2011年報告中所述"10美國池包含比福島第一核電站更龐大更多廢料，美國的奇異馬克一型沸水堆標記當中最打包帶, 在美國的任何核電廠池作為廢料約 75%的商業 65,000 噸輻照的核燃料在美國，存儲池，，而 25%已轉移到幹罐子。核實用程式傾向于儘量使其，以推遲乾燥的儲存桶到成本的池未來。這大大增加了池的風險。恐慌性，在美國大多數奇異馬克一型沸水堆儲蓄很多, 比福島第一核電站所有四個反應堆單位放加起起來 （354 噸）.11 更多廢料，
例如蠔克裡克 (NJ)，最古老仍然經營原子反應堆 (1969年到 2012 年），美國已生成約 750 度量噸的廢料含 1 億 2500 萬居理的放射性物質 ；即使其輻照過燃料了一些轉移乾燥的儲存桶中，絕大多數仍留在池中。
佛蒙特州揚基已產生約 650 公噸的廢料，包含 1 億居理的放射性物質 ；它遭受附近小姐重
近年來載入下降。費米 2 （MI） 產生了將近 600 噸的廢料，含 9000 萬居裡 ；因為核廠的結構不足夠強烈焊接所有其輻照燃料都存儲在其池中，支援的起重機和完全載入的木桶重量的轉移操作 ；底特律愛迪生擁有承認這站停電，4 小時 12 分鐘內將導致池沸騰。
同樣地，朝聖者 (MA)存儲所有的廢料，含有超過 7000 萬居理 ，在其池其超過 550 噸。
2012 年 1 月此聲明的註腳的版本張貼于：
HTTP://www.beyondnuclear.org/radioactive-waste-whatsnew/2012/2/6/catastrophic-risks-of-ge-bwr-mark-i-highlevel-
放射性 w.html
超越核
6930 卡羅爾大道，套房 400，派克、 MD 20912 T.301 時 270 時 2209 F.301 時 270 時 4000
電子郵件: info@beyondnuclear.org 網站： www.beyondnuclear.org
References
1 Stohl et al., “Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear
power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition,” Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., 11, 28319-28394, 2011, http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-
2011.html.
2 In the 1980s, a raccoon was electrocuted at the Fermi 2 nuclear power plant in Monroe, Michigan, and power
was lost to the plant from the electric grid. Fermi 2, by the way, is the largest GE BWR Mark I in the world, at
1,122 megawatts-electric.
3 http://markey.house.gov/press-release/august-24-2011-nrc-va-earthquake-highlights-need-update-usnuclear-
safety-standards
4 “Technical Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk at Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants,” (NUREG-
1738), Feb. 2001, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1738/.
5 Robert Alvarez, Jan Beyea, Klaus Janberg, Jungmin Kang, Ed Lyman, Allison Macfarlane, Gordon
Thompson, and Frank N. von Hippel published “Reducing the hazards from stored spent power-reactor fuel in
the United States” in Science & Global Security, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2003.
6 The National Academy of Sciences Report on “Safety and Security of Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel,” April
6, 2005.
7 See the Statement of Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors, including the list of signatories,
at http://www.ieer.org/reports/DOE_WasteContracts2010/HOSS_PRINCIPLES_3-23-10x.pdf.
8 Robert Alvarez, Introduction, “Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the U.S.: Reducing the Deadly Risks of Storage,”
Institute for Policy Studies, Washington, D.C., May, 2011, http://www.ipsdc.
org/reports/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reducing_the_deadly_risks_of_storage.
9 http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nuclear-reactors-whatsnew/2012/1/3/nrc-accepts-beyond-nuclear-petitionedactions-
for-review-at.html.
10 http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/millstone-unit-1.html
11 U.S. Department of Energy, Final Environmental Impact Statement for Yucca Mountain, Table A-7, Feb.
2002.
1 Stohl et al., “Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear
power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition,” Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., 11, 28319-28394, 2011, http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-
2011.html.
2 In the 1980s, a raccoon was electrocuted at the Fermi 2 nuclear power plant in Monroe, Michigan, and power
was lost to the plant from the electric grid. Fermi 2, by the way, is the largest GE BWR Mark I in the world, at
1,122 megawatts-electric.
3 http://markey.house.gov/press-release/august-24-2011-nrc-va-earthquake-highlights-need-update-usnuclear-
safety-standards
4 “Technical Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk at Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants,” (NUREG-
1738), Feb. 2001, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1738/.
5 Robert Alvarez, Jan Beyea, Klaus Janberg, Jungmin Kang, Ed Lyman, Allison Macfarlane, Gordon
Thompson, and Frank N. von Hippel published “Reducing the hazards from stored spent power-reactor fuel in
the United States” in Science & Global Security, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2003.
6 The National Academy of Sciences Report on “Safety and Security of Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel,” April
6, 2005.
7 See the Statement of Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors, including the list of signatories,
at http://www.ieer.org/reports/DOE_WasteContracts2010/HOSS_PRINCIPLES_3-23-10x.pdf.
8 Robert Alvarez, Introduction, “Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the U.S.: Reducing the Deadly Risks of Storage,”
Institute for Policy Studies, Washington, D.C., May, 2011, http://www.ipsdc.
org/reports/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reducing_the_deadly_risks_of_storage.
9 http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nuclear-reactors-whatsnew/2012/1/3/nrc-accepts-beyond-nuclear-petitionedactions-
for-review-at.html.
10 http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/millstone-unit-1.html
11 U.S. Department of Energy, Final Environmental Impact Statement for Yucca Mountain, Table A-7, Feb.
2002.
Stop Kudankulam Nuclear Plant! Help Save The Indian Ocean!
Signatures: 51 (Goal: 500)
We, ardent lovers of humanity and marine life, request the Chief Justice of India to persuade the Govt. of India to keep the Indian Ocean free of nuclear discharges, and convert the Koodankulam Nuclear Plant into an alternative source of energy. Let us present a safer world for our generations to follow.The Indian and Russian authorities have been adamantly going ahead with the project without respect for the apprehensions of the local villagers.
Nuclear waste from Koodankulam is to be discharged into the Indian Ocean and the local villagers have been engaged in peaceful protests like hunger-strike. The Indian Government has to be persuaded to convert this facility into an alternative source of energy.
Everyone agrees that nuclear waste will remain radioactive forever in the Ocean. ( keep reading & sign the petition Indian Voice )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)