Friday, 13 July 2012

H.A.A.R.P. CLOUDS BEFORE THE JAPAN QUAKE! ABSOLUTE PROOF H.A.A.R.P. WAS USED!!!

Haiti Earthquke - HAARP - Jesse Ventura- Truth Exposed 

Uploaded by on 16 Jan 2010

Government caused the 7.0 EarthQuake in Haiti

Ask your self why Haiti, Haiti is a independent black nation, a threat to American imperialism, defeated the colonizers in the past, and has been an enemy to the government control structure for years.

Earthquakes are caused by plate tectonics shifting, impossible giving the geographical location of port-u- prince, donate Haiti relief effort, spread this video, support www.freeplanet2012.com, in there divine effort to liberate the people. Peace and respect to the human family.


H.A.A.R.P. CLOUDS BEFORE THE JAPAN QUAKE! ABSOLUTE PROOF H.A.A.R.P. WAS USED!!!

...........
Published in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) publication Technology Review, the findings are presented alongside a different theory called Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, which hypothesizes that the heating in the ionosphere may have been caused by the impending earthquake as the fault line released radioactive radon. This theory, of course, is not actually proven, but is instead presented as a possible explanation for the presence of the high-density electrons and emitted infrared radiation that was observed.
Evidence that HAARP is not only capable of inducing earthquakes, but that it appears to have been used on Japan
 A casual glance at the graphics presented as part of Ouzounov's research data shows near-perfect heat rings present above the epicenter of the quake. If radon emissions from the fault line were truly responsible for creating these heat zones, they would more than likely have had irregular, scattered appearances, rather than concentric circles. This anomaly by itself debunks the theory that the impending earthquake caused the heat patterns.

Also, readings from the HAARP Induction Magnetometer, which visualizes the frequency spectrum of signals detected in the earth's geomagnetic field, show that a steady, ultra-low frequency (ULF) of roughly 2.5 Hz was being broadcast days before the earthquake. The 2.5 Hz ULF happens to be the exact same frequency as the natural resonance produced by an earthquake -- and since there were no constant earthquakes occurring on the days before the quake as the HAARP Induction Magnetometer appeared to indicate, the logical conclusion is that the signal was being broadcast to induce the quake (http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1624).

Some would argue that HAARP is not capable of producing such frequencies, especially at the power levels that would be required to induce a massive earthquake like the 9.0+ that occurred in Japan. But testimony by various governments says otherwise.

On April 28, 1997, then US Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen gave an important keynote address at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and US Strategy at the University of Georgia in Athens. When asked a question about terrorism, Cohen had this to say as part of his response about the type of technology that existed, even back then:

"Others are engaging even in an eco-type terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves" (http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674).........

.....EU report on the environment, security and foreign policy, that was released on January 14, 1999 (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPO...). This report outlines various types of weapon threats, including a section entitled, "HAARP - a weapons system which disrupts the climate."
 ......"HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system."  (Read more...)





No comments:

Post a Comment